|
TAMIL NADU ROAD SECTOR PROJECT
SOCIAL IMPACTS AND RESETTLEMENT: SUMMARY ENTITLEMENT MATRIX
|
| |
Land acquisition |
Inside Right of Way |
| Impacts and assistance criteria |
Vulnerable |
Non - Vulnerable |
Vulnerable |
Non - Vulnerable |
| A. Corridor of Impact: Loss of land
and other assets
Support given to the families and house holds
|
| 1. Consultation, counseling regarding
alternatives, and assistance in identifying new sites and
opportunities |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 2. Compensation for Land at replacement
cost, free of fees or other charges |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| 3. Advance notice to harvest
non-perennial crops, or compensation for lost standing crop |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 4.Compensation for perennial crops and
trees, calculating as annual net product value multiplied by numbers
of years required for new crop to start producing |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| 5. Replacement or compensation for
structures and other non-land assets |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 6. Rights to salvage materials from the
existing structures, trees, and other assets |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 7. Assistance in accessing housing
schemes, or other targeted support to assist poor and vulnerable in
reestablishing their homes |
1 |
|
1 |
|
| 8. Option of housing in resettlement
sites in cases of cluster relocation |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 9. shifting assistance and transition
stipends. |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| B. Corridor of Impact:
Lost or diminished livelihood
Support given to adult individuals |
| 10. Rehabilitation and assistance for
lost or diminished livelihood |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 11. Additional support mechanisms for
vulnerable groups in reestablishing livelihood |
1 |
|
1 |
|
| 12. Employment opportunities in
connection with project |
1 |
|
1 |
|
| 13. Any other impacts not yet
identified, whether loss of assets or livelihood |
Unforeseen impacts shall be
documented and mitigated based on the principles agreed upon in this
policy framework |
| C. Indirect, group-oriented
impacts in the vicinity of the road corridor |
| Group oriented support will be given
to mitigate negative impacts and enhance development opportunities. |
| These categories and support
mechanisms are described in more details in the following. |
| 2.3
SUPPORT PRINCIPLES FOR DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF IMPACTS
Loss of assets
The project may cause people to lose productive
land or house plots, structures, wells, trees or other assets.
The project will therefore compensate and replace lost assets at
their replacement cost defined as the amount required for the
affected person to replace the lost assets through purchase in the
open market. The entitlement unit for such assistance is the
household or family.
To the extent possible the Project will aim at
obtaining land through negotiating purchase prices with the sellers,
acting as a buyer in the open market. Only if mutual
agreement can not be reached about a purchase price, will the Land
Acquisition Act and the Government's right of Eminent Domain be
invoked.
Existing records of land transaction and other
official documents pertaining to the value of carious assets are
generally not reliable as indicators or real value. The Indian
Land Acquisition Act stipulates that additional compensation known
as solatium is to be paid on the top of the registered value of land
and other assets, in recognition of the involuntary nature of the
acquisition. However, it may still be insufficient to reach
real replacement cost, or it may overvalue assets unnecessarily.
The project will therefore objectively establish the real
replacement cost of assets to be required. This will be done
through conducting a Land Market Value Survey and through compiling
other available sources of information.
Experience shows that cash compensation carries a
high risk and is normally inadequate in helping poor and
vulnerable groups re-establish their lost assets, particularly in
the case of productive land. Wealthier or more resourceful
people, on the other hand, may prefer cash compensation which in
their case does not entail a risk. The project will therefore
provide the option of compensation in kind as well as other support
mechanisms to those deemed as vulnerable or at risk.
Replacement land of equal or better productive value will be offered
as an option to those losing substantial amounts of land (i.e. 25 %
of their holdings or more), or where loss of land threatens the
economic viability of the household.
The costs of compensation for land and other
assets acquired for civil works or other purposes are to borne by
the State Government, in accordance with procedures set out in the
Indian Land Acquisition Act. The World Bank has not financed such
costs in any of its projects, and is unable to do so in this
project.
However, any additional costs related to
resettlement. capacity building, and other activities required to
implement the Resettlement Action Plan, may be covered under the
loan. This may in certain cases include additional support
mechanisms other than legal compensation for land, to ensure that
affected people benefit from the project and do not suffer any net
losses.
Loss of House and Shelter
People losing their home represent a particular
challenge in the resettlement program. Every effort will be made by
the project to ensure that new housing is available before people
are required to relocate.
The project involves linear resettlement, where
narrow strips of land are affected along the road corridor. Large
population clusters are therefore not likely to be affected by the
project. The preferred approach is to assist the people to move back
and away from the corridor of Impact, without having to move far
away from and disrupting local networks and support mechanisms.
If it is found that clusters of people have to be
relocated, the project will provide new housing in a resettlement
site approval by the affected people, with adequate infrastructure
and utilities. This will be provided as an option, although people
may still chose self-relocation if they wish. In that case,
compensation and other support should be provided to them, and the
project should assist and facilitate their resettlement process.
If resettlement sites are developed as part of the
project, the local "host population" will also be
consulted about their views and needs, and be given
appropriate support to reduce any negative impact caused by an
influx of new people.
Loss of livelihood or income opportunities
In some cases, the displacement caused by the
project may lead to loss of livelihood or income opportunities,
either temporarily or permanently. In such cases, assistance
will be given to the affected population to reestablish their
livelihood and income, and to compensate for temporary losses.
The unit entitlement eligible for support in such cases will be the
adult individual, both men and women. All adult members of
households affected in this way will be eligible for support.
In the case of road projects, am common loss is
the displacement of a business structure such as a small roadside
shop. The project will assist such business in relocating, and
in continuing their preferred occupation without loss of customer
base.
If the project impact leads to people being unable
to continue with the previous occupation, the project will provide
support and assistance through alternative employment strategies.
Where possible, project affected people will be given employment in
opportunities created by the project, such as work with construction
or maintenance. Longer term earning opportunities will be
provided through strategies such as vocational training, employment
counseling, inclusion in income generating screens, and assets to
credit.
Group -based development opportunities
In addition to the direct losses of assets or
livelihoods, the project is likely to have more indirect impacts on
the population living in the vicinity of the road corridor.
While many of these impacts are positive, some are negative and
should be mitigated. These may include impacts on traffic
safety, access to water and sanitation, access to common property
resources, and impact on non-motorized transport such as
pedestrians, bullock carts, etc. Increased long-distance
traffic has been shown to lead to increase in AIDS and other
sexually Transmitted Diseases. Community-owned assets such as
schools and temples may also be affected by the project.
Through designs, provision of infrastructure, and
other support mechanisms, the project will replace lost assets and
minimize any negative impact on groups, particularly groups which
are considered vulnerable. Even where there is no discernible
negative impact, the project will seek to benefit the local
population, for example by providing bus stops where none existed
previously.
If the project affects tribal groups living in the
vicinity of the road corridor, special attention will be paid to
develop support mechanisms which are culturally appropriate to the
affected tribal groups. In such cases, Government of India and
World Bank policies related to tribal groups and indigenous people
will be followed.
|
| 2.4 TARGETED SUPPORT TO
VULNERABLE GROUPS
For the purposes of this project, different
criteria and categories of vulnerability have been defined. As
a margin of safety, people earning up to a certain percentage level
above the officially recognized poverty line within the state will
be considered at risk in this context and included among the
vulnerable groups eligible for targeted support. Increasing
the margin and eligibility criteria in this manner is done in
recognition of the difference between existing development
programs for the poor, where impacts from the project itself may
lead people to suffer a reduction in living standards.
Thus, a safety margin is provided, to ensure that adequate support
is given to all people deemed as potentially vulnerable or at risk.
Through census surveys and other studies, the
project will determine who among the affected population may be
considered as vulnerable or at risk, or who are likely to be
excluded from the normal benefits of growth and development.
Vulnerable groups may include but not be limited to:
- Poor or landless
people
- Scheduled tribes or
castes
- Women-headed
households
- Children and elderly
- Disabled people
Different impacts will affect these groups
differently, depending on the reason for their vulnerability under
the project. Children may be particularly at risk in terms of
traffic safety, for example, while poor people may be at risk of
losing economic viability if they lose agricultural land.
For the purpose of this project, those considered
as poor will be members of any household earning up to twenty-five
percent more than the official state poverty level in Tamil Nadu
Road. Since the project may cause temporary or permanent loss of
income, even those earning slightly more than the poverty level are
at risk: thus the vulnerability criterion is set to poverty level
plus 25 percent.
Vulnerable groups will receive targeted support
and special attention from the project, and be provided with more
options and support mechanisms than those not considered
vulnerable. The issue of options is discussed in the next section.
2.5 OPTIONS AND CHOICES
The project will provide options and choices among
different entitlements to the affected population. As part of the
project consultation and participation mechanisms, people will be
informed and consulted about the project and its impact, and their
entitlements and options.
Affected population will be counseled so they are
able to make informed choices among the options provided. The
project will therefore undertake a risk and benefit analysis of each
of the options and support mechanisms and explain benefits and
potential risks to the affected population. This will be done
particularly in the case of vulnerable individuals and groups, who
will be encouraged to chose the options which entail the lowest
risk.
By allowing people to choose among different
options the project will seek to make people active participants in
the development process and to achieve greater acceptance of the
resettlement and rehabilitation efforts.
|
| 3.
RESETTLEMENT PLANNING APPROACH |
| 3.1 CORRIDOR OF IMPACT
Displacement under the project will be limited to
the corridor required for the road and its safety zone.
This corridor is referred to as the Corridor of Impact.
Within this corridor, there should be no structures or other
hindrances.
The advantage to this approach is that such a
corridor is easier to maintain free of encumbrances than the full
Right of Ways. Since the density of structures and other
encroachments is not very high close to the road, the need for
resettlement is reduced to less than a quarter of what would be
required if the entire ROW were to be cleared- with corresponding
savings in cost and efforts2.
The project will ensure that those outside the
corridor of impact but inside the Right of Way are not displaced
during the lifetime of the project. It they are made to move
during the lifetime of the project or within three years after the
completion of the project, they will be considered eligible for the
support mechanisms available to people affected by the project.
It is recognized that this approach offers
only a temporary solution, and does not adequately address the
longer term needs of maintaining the Right of Way clear, or of
providing the squatters and encroaches with the security of tenure
needed to improve their lives. The project will therefore
investigate and attempt to achieve more permanent solutions, such as
facilitating access to credit or other ways for squatters and
encroachers to obtain security of tenure.
|
| 3.2 PHASED APPROACH
By limiting displacement and the need for
resettlement to the corridor of impact, exact identification of
affected population is not possible until engineering designs have
been completed. A shift in alignment of a meter may mean the
difference between whether a person is considered affected by the
project or not.
The World Bank and the Government of Tamil Nadu
have agreed that during the appraisal process, final designs will be
prepared for approximately forty percent of the roads to be
improved. This means that for those roads, exact numbers, identities
and socio economic characteristics of the project affected
population will be made available and included in the Resettlement
Action Plan. Estimates based on preliminary designs and initial
studies will be made for the reminder of the project. During the
project implementation phase, additional studies will be undertaken
to update the Action Plans in coordination with designs, principles
for socio - economic studies are described in the next section
|
| 3.3 SOCIAL ASSESSMENT, CENSUS AND
SURVEY
Social Assessment
A social assessment will be undertaken for the
project, in order to support participation and make explicit the
social factors affecting the development impacts and results. this
social assessments will identify stakeholders and key social issues,
and formulate a participation and consultation strategy. It will
specifically address the issue of how vulnerable and excluded groups
may benefit from the project.
CENSUS AND BASELINE SOCIO ECONOMIC SURVEYS
A full census will be under taken to register and
document the status of the potentially affected population within
the project impact area, their assets and sources of livelihood.
This census will cover 100 % of the potentially affected population
within the likely corridor of impact and a reasonable distance
beyond, to ensure that people and assts have been registered in case
of a later shift in road alignment. Legal boundaries including the
Right of way will be verified and certified.
Following final designs, those within the Corridor
of Impact will be considered eligible for support under the project.
This is likely to be a substantially lower number than those
initially covered in the census.
The date of the census will be cut off date for
entitlements under the project, to determine who may b e entitled to
support. People moving into the project area after this cutoff date
will not be entitled to support. It is therefore important to
undertake this census at the earliest possible date to avoid an
influx of new people seeking benefits under the project. In the
cases where land acquisition will be required, the date of the first
notification under the law will be considered the cut off date.
A limited sample of the potentially affected
population will be studied in more detailed to provide the baseline
information against which project impacts will measured and
evaluated. This sample will be representative of the different
impact categories identified.
|
| 3.4 COORDINATION BETWEEN CIVIL
WORKS AND RESETTLEMENT
SCREENING AND PLANNING
.Every effort will be made to reduce
potential negative impacts of the project, both in terms of
environment and social issues. The project will therefore carefully
coordinate the design process with the finds from screening and
studies related to socio economic impacts and the environment, in
order to minimize negative impacts and maximize benefits.
When choosing among different design options, such
as whether to construct a bypass or improve the road through a built
up area, environmental social indicators will be factored into
decision along with technical and economical considerations.
IMPLEMENTATION
During project implementation, the resettlement
program will be coordinated with the completion of designs and the
likely timing of civil works. The project will provide adequate
notification, counseling and assistance to affect people so that
they are able to move or give up their assets without undue hardship
before civil works are to start.
In the case of Land Acquisition, the Indian Land
Acquisition Act constraints rules for the time required from when
people are first notified about the State's intent to acquire the
land, to the time people are required to vacate their holdings. The
normal procedures for Land acquisition will be followed in this
project. Although the land acquisition act has a provision for
emergency acquisition requiring shorter time, this clause will not
be invoked unless it is documented that an emergency exists and that
it is not possible to follow the normal procedures for Land
Acquisition.
The project will ensure that civil works are not
started on any road segment before compensation and assistance to
the affected population have been provided in accordance with this
policy frame work.
|
| 3.5 CONSULTATIONS AND
PARTICIPATIONS PROCESS
Experience indicates that involuntary resettlement
generally gives rise to serve problems for the affected population.
These problems may be reduced if, as part of a resettlement program,
people are properly informed and consulted about the project, their
situation and preferences, and allowed to make meaningful choices.
This services to reduce the insecurity and opposition to the project
which otherwise are likely to occur.
The project will therefore ensure that the
affected population and other stakeholders are informed consulted in
a meaningful way, and allowed to participants actively in the
development process. This will be done throughout the project, both
during preparing, implementation, and monitoring of project results
and impact.
The consultation will be conducted in a way which
is appropriate for cultural, gender - based and other differences
among the stakeholders. Where different groups or individuals
have different views or opinions, particular emphasis will be put on
the views and needs of the more vulnerable groups.
|
| 3.6 INSTITUTIONAL
ARRANGEMENTS
The Resettlement Action Plans will contain
detailed information about institutional and organizational
mechanisms required to implement the plan. A project Implementation
Unit (PIU) will have responsibility for coordinating resettlement
along with other project components, and will be staffed with people
with experience in resettlement and social development.
The project implementation will require
coordination among different agencies, working in different
districts and jurisdictions. This represents particular challenges,
and may pose a risk a delays in implementation of the resettlement
program. An assessment will therefore be made of institutional
capacity and risks. This assessment will be described in the
Resettlement Action Plan, accompanied by a strategy for developing
the required capacity and minimize implementation risks. This will
include analysis of training needs and a plan for training of
personnel at different levels. Such capacity building will be
coordinated with the overall project implementation schedule, to
ensure that skilled staff are available to implement the
Resettlement Action Plan without causing delays to civil works.
Since much of the work related to resettlement
involves social development and community participation, the project
will work with agencies experienced in this type of work, such as
NGOs.
Consideration will also be given to coordinating
with other development programs, such as vulnerable groups housing
schemes or rural development NGOs in order to provide the project
affected population with access to services and programs already in
place.
While consultancy services will be used in
preparing and implementing this project, an important objective is
to develop local capacity to plan and implement resettlement
programs. The project will therefore document how capacity
building at different levels is achieved, and how this project
contributes to improved sector level or state wide policies and
practices related to resettlement in the state.
|
| 3.7 COSTS AND BUDGETS
The Resettlement Action Plan will contain a
consolidated overview of estimated costs. This will be consists of
an item wise budget estimate for resettlement implementation,
including administrative expenses, monitoring and evaluation and
contingencies. The cost of resettlement will be included in the
overall costs of the project.
Compensation amounts and other support
mechanisms will be adjusted based on inflation factors. The
budget will incorporate provisions for this, and the Resettlement
Action Plan will describe how such adjustments and updates to the
budget are to be made.
Experience from similar projects show that
resettlement costs in road projects are low compared with
overall project costs. Delays or or inadequacies in
implementing the resettlement program may however lead to costly
delays in overall project implementation. Since progress in
civil works depends on satisfactory completion of the resettlement
program.
The State of Tamil Nadu will pay for costs
related to Land Acquisition and compensation for transfer of title
to property from private individuals to the state. Other support
mechanisms, such as training, capacity building, income generating
schemes etc., can be covered through the funds provided through
the expected World Bank loan.
|
| 3.8 GRIEVANCE
REDRESS
It is expected that through a participatory
process and good compensation and support mechanisms, acceptance
of the project will be enhanced and complaints reduced. There may
nevertheless be individuals or groups who feel that they are not
given adequate support, or that their needs are not properly
addressed. The project will therefore establish a grievance
Redress process with local committees which will hear complaints
and facilitate solution. This Grievance Redress process will be
used to settle disputes through mediation, and to reduce
unnecessary litigation.
The Resettlement Action plan will describe the
step - by - step process for registering and addressing
grievances, and provide details regarding registering complaints,
response times, communication modes, and mechanisms for appeal or
approaching civil courts if other provision fail.
In addition to local Government officials and
representatives of the project, each Grievance Redress Committee
will have representation from the local affected population and
collaborating agencies.
|
| 3.9 MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
The Resettlement Action Plan will contain
indicators and benchmarks for achievement of the objectives under
the resettlement program. these indicators and bench marks will be
of three kinds:
- Process indicators, indicating project
inputs, expenditures, staff deployment, etc.,
- Output indicators, indicating results in
terms of numbers of affected people compensated and resettled,
training held, credit disbursed, etc.,
- Impact indicators, related to the longer term
effect of the project on people's lives.
The benchmarks and indicators will be limited in
number, and combine quantitative and qualitative types of date.
The first two types of indicators related to
process and immediate outputs and results, will be monitored
internally by the project. This information will be serve to
inform project management about the progress and results, and to
adjust the work program where necessary if delays of problem
arise. The results of this monitoring will be summarized in
reports which will be submitted to the world bank on a regular
basis.
Provision will be made for participatory
monitoring involving the project affected people and beneficiaries
of the resettlement program in assessing results and impacts.
The project will also contract with an external
agency such as an academic institute, which will undertake
independent evaluations at least twice during the lifetime of the
project. As an input to a midterm review, and as an longer term
impact evaluation as an input to a project completion report. Such
independent evaluation will focus on assessing whether the overall
objectives of the project are being met, and will use the defined
impact indicators as a basis for evaluation.
|
|